Am 13.03.2013 13:10, schrieb Bastien:
Andreas Röhler <andreas.roeh...@easy-emacs.de> writes:
Or maybe drop that sentence.
Nope: the whole purpose of clarifying is to make it clear what are
the licensing terms, when the assignement is needed, and what are the
consequences of assigning the copyright.
We should be short but exhaustive here.
The idea is to make sure people understand that sending patches for
Org's core is *exactly* like having the patch integrated into Emacs.
Both the copyright assignment and the agreement on the licensing terms
are preconditions.
Hi Bastien, Hi Carsten,
as these legal matters are of interest to a certain extend:
1) does this change/sentence meet the problem arised?
2) is the sentence in question here true, can it be true?
1d There was no misunderstanding but displayed frustration, eagerness or
whatever.
No misunderstanding, no need to clarify the pretended matter.
2nd) If someone changes a GPLed file while propagating the changes with a
compatible license as mentioned
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses:
Is org-mode going to create its own legislation excluding this? :)
Cheers
