Hi Aaron,
Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes:
> I suspect you may be targeting the wrong layer. Don't we want to use
> org-link-protocols, not org-link-abbrev-alist? Protocols are already
> handled by the exporter, so there should be no need for a change like
> this one:
> [...]
I want to allow adding link protocols (what I called "adding link
types") from #+LINK.
>> Nicolas, do you think it is feasible/good to delay link expansion
>> till the backend knows whether the abbreviated link is associated
>> to follow/export function that would understand formatting strings
>> in the abbreviated form?
>
> My proposal works without any changes to the exporter's structure
> (except adding the #+BIBLIOGRAPHY keyword, which is a one-line
> emendation). It does not allow the equivalent of your "#+LINK:
> bib:%s;%s;%s" for specifying the pre/post delimiters, but maybe it
> would be better from a standardization-of-syntax point of view to have
> just one way of encoding them?
IIUC your proposal introduces some syntactic glue here:
[[type:key;pre;post][desc]]
^ ^
If we allow this, it's better to allow this in general than just for a
specific link type. Hence my proposal to extend link abbreviation to
be recognized as new link types when the #+LINK line contains more
than two strings.
See for example this new link type (or "protocol"):
#+LINK: with-title::%s http://orgmode.org/worg/doc.html# nil
org-html-link-with-title
[[with-title::org-mode::A link title][org-mode]]
org-html-link-with-title would then take care of exporting this
as a link like <a href="..." title="A link title">org-mode</a>.
There are really two changes here:
1. extending #+LINK so that the third and fourth strings are
recognized as follow and export functions
2. extending #+LINK so that a formatting string in the link
abbreviation name is handle later on by those functions.
What do you think?
--
Bastien
