Hello, Alan L Tyree <alanty...@gmail.com> writes:
> Problem 1: definition lists when exported to HTML, ODT or ASCII look > just like they do in the ort-mode file. Shouldn't they be "fixed up" > somehow? Could you give examples of the "fixed up" output you expect in these cases? > Problem 2: I need to export footnotes that are not Org footnotes. They > look like this: > > 1. This is footnote one > > 2. This is footnote two What are "footnotes" that are not "Org footnotes"? Do you mean "I need to use lists instead of footnotes"? > Of course, the exporter thinks that I am dealing with ordered > lists. According to the manual (*if* I understand it correctly), I > should be able to get what I want with: > > [@1]. This is footnote 1. > > [@2]. This is footnote 2. > > But I don't. The exported text looks exactly like the two lines above. > > Am I doing something wrong? I'm not sure to understand, but, IIUC, you want a list with counters. The correct syntax should then be: 3. [@3] This is footnote 3 You don't have to specify a counter on each item, as numbers of items below will be incremented automatically. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
