Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > On 2/24/13, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On 2/20/13, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> The basic syntax is similar to the one used by `footnote.el', i.e. >>>> a footnote is defined in a paragraph that is started by a footnote >>>> marker in square brackets in column 0, no indentation allowed. If you >>>> need a paragraph break inside a footnote, use the LaTeX idiom `\par'. >>> >>> I am aware of that, but blank lines were allowed after a while. One >>> issue was filling. >>> >>> Even \par fails to work now. :( >> >> It should now be fixed. Just replace \par with an empty line. > > The fix does not work. > > I tried blank line and it still exported verbatim. > > I then tried \par, and it still filled the footnote and inserted > "\par" into it.
I think we're not talking about the same thing. The fix allows empty lines in regular footnote definitions, not inline ones. > If this cannot be fixed, then I need some way of filtering to achieve > it. Filtering cannot help you here, since you need to, at least, agree with the structure of the document being parsed. If you want lists, tables, paragraphs... in a footnote, regular definitions are the way to go. If, for some reason, you refuse to use regular definitions, you could write a hook which would call `org-footnote-normalize', in order to transform your inline definitions in regular definitions, and then replace "\par" with an empty line. That hook function can be added in `org-export-before-parsing-hook'. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
