Hi Joost, Joost Helberg <jo...@snow.nl> writes:
> The manual states that the width and alignment values can be > combined. The example uses a combination of <l> and <10>. The `l' is > not the best way to demonstrate this, as it looks like a `1'. The > scanning reader may see <110> instead of <l10>. If the manual reads > <r10>, the example is a lot more valuable. Done. > Also, in order to not rely > on an example only, the text `may also combine alignment and field > width' will be better if it reads `may also combine alignment and > field width as a single multi letter specification within pointy > brackets' I don't find this necessary, the sentence is too heavy like this. Thanks, -- Bastien
