Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, > > Eric Abrahamsen <e...@ericabrahamsen.net> writes: > >>> Strictly speaking, yes. But Org Agenda is a bit permissive (and not only >>> for that thing). Do you want to help basing Agenda on Elements?
[...] >> This is something I've wanted for a while, as it would make >> some of my little personal projects a lot easier. I'd be happy to help >> if there's a roadmap, and if I can be fed bite-sized problems to deal >> with. > > There's no roadmap for now. If you're looking for small tasks to handle, > I think interactive functions are a good start (although some can be > a bit challenging, i.e. `org-open-link'). Particularly good candidates > are those calling either `org-at-regexp-p', `org-in-regexp' or > `org-between-regexps-p': using those is almost always wrong (or at least > fragile). > > If you give a shot at some of them, please include ert tests: writings > tests for Org is really a must from now on. There are now plenty of > examples in testing directory. Great, thanks for the pointers. I'll see if I can't provide a few patches in the next couple of weeks. E
