Simon Thum <simon.t...@gmx.de> writes: > I know that, but I deemed it useful to document it as a related but > separate mechanism on its own merit. Perhaps there could be a link to > 10.3.1 to make it clear that the notations differ in important ways?
Since %%(...) syntax isn't a timestamp /per se/, there is no reason to refer to it in the timestamps part of the manual. Also, despite its own merit, it's an antiquated[fn:1] and irregular syntax, which doesn't deserve much publicity. It won't disappear, but it's better to circumvent its uses. Regards, [fn:1] Even the example given in "Calendar/Diary integration" section is outdated, as it relies on CATEGORY keyword to change category on the fly within the same section (see footnote in 10.4.1). -- Nicolas Goaziou
