Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes:
Hi Nick,
were you able to reproduce my problem?
> Christopher Schmidt <christop...@ch.ristopher.com> wrote:
>
>> Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes:
>> > In any case, if you can get rid of the let-bind (or the need to
>> > muck with TeX-master at all within org), without introducing a
>> > regression, we are all ears.
>>
>> I think adding (require 'tex nil t) before the let form is a nice fix.
>>
>
> Not really: you end up pulling in auctex even if you are not going to
> use it.
What do you think about
(when to-buffer
(let ((sym 'latex-mode))
(while (symbolp sym)
(setq sym (symbol-function sym)))
(when (eq (car-safe sym) 'autoload)
(load (cadr sym) sym t t))))
?
Christopher
