Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > I tend to think that :raw-value would be a good option. Timestamps > properties could be enriched. Besides common properties > (:begin, :end, :post-blank) timestamps objects may accept : > > - :type > - :year-start > - :year-end > - :month-start > - :month-end > - :day-start > - :day-end > - :hour-start > - :hour-end > - :minute-start > - :minute-end > - :repeater-type (a symbol among: `cumulative', 'catch-up', 'restart' > corresponding to, respectively "+", "++" ".+" repeater marks) > - :repeater-value > - :raw-value > > :*-end properties would be the same as :*-start properties when > timestamp isn't a range. Both would be nil (along with :repeater-*) when > type is `diary'. > > By default back-ends would use :raw-value and `org-translate-time'. > > :range-end property would be removed.
Done. I've also added :repeater-unit for good measure. Regards,
