Hello, Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes:
> These are all valid arguments. However, I did design > Org-mode to be LaTeX-near to make sure that it becomes > easy and fast to type as a notes environment. In my mind, a user > expecting \cite{...} to work in other backends is not necessarily > a wrong expectation, and if we introduce a syntax for doing citations > in HTML, why not using the LaTeX syntax for it? > > So actually, it seems I do not fully agree with your *consistency* > argument. While you are right that it is the logical and clean thing > if you view Org as a markup language created for export, it is not > necessarily the right solution for a convenience point of view. My point is not about removing anything related to LaTeX syntax. I'm fine with a \cite{...} (although I think [[cite:...]] may be cleaner) as long as it really is accepted by most major export back-ends. But I think accepting raw commands like \vspace, \hfill and al. is not necessary (as long as there's still a way to send them to the export back-end). We shouldn't trick users into thinking these commands will be obeyed in any situation. Moreover, I don't think that they belong to an easy and fast to type notes environment. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou