Jambunathan K <kjambunat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > With Richard's example[fn:1] and the new exporter, we get different > > behavior with HTML and latex (without the num: option or with num:t): > > > > o the second list is unordered in HTML, but enumerated in latex. > > > > o we get third level section numbers decorating the list entries in HTML, > > but not in latex. > > I think our mails crossed. This should be fixed.
Oh, indeed - they are consistent now. Thanks! > Remember, I have not marked HTML and ODT exporters for release. They > are marked as alpha only. What may seems as bugs, could well be > something that is partially done. Understood - but there is still the fact that different exporters are written by different people: they are bound to diverge unless some energy is expended to keep them in line. I just wanted to emphasize the importance of consistency (probably preaching to the choir). Thanks, Nick