>Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 13:39:32 -0600
>From: Eric Schulte <eric.schu...@gmx.com>
>To: nicholas.do...@hp.com
>Cc: Richard Stanton <stan...@haas.berkeley.edu>,
> "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
>Subject: Re: [O] Question on latex source block
>Message-ID: <87ligj6l57....@gmx.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes:
>
>> Eric Schulte <eric.schu...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >
>>> > Nothing - it's a bug introduced by commit
>>>a9d3ce0bcd3492eb0cd2aa7b0d1f6ee93276114b:
>>> >
>>> > ,----
>>> > | commit a9d3ce0bcd3492eb0cd2aa7b0d1f6ee93276114b
>>> > | Author: Feng Shu <tuma...@gmail.com>
>>> > | Date: Fri Apr 20 19:21:43 2012 +0200
>>> > |
>>> > | Allow to use imagemagick for previewing LaTeX fragements.
>>> > |
>>> > | * org.el (org-latex-create-formula-image-program): New option
>>> > | to use either dvipng or imagemagick to convert and preview
>>> > | LaTeX fragments.
>>> > | (org-preview-latex-fragment, org-format-latex): Handle the new
>>> > | option.
>>> > | (org-create-formula-image-with-dvipng): Rename from
>>> > | `org-create-formula-image'.
>>> > | (org-create-formula-image-with-imagemagick): New defun to
>>> > | handle LaTeX preview with imagemagick.
>>> > | (org-latex-color, org-latex-color-format): New defuns to
>>> > | handle color conversions.
>>> > |
>>> > | * org-latex.el (org-latex-to-pdf-process, org-export-as-pdf):
>>> > | Allow to use imagemagick to convert LaTeX fragments.
>>> > |
>>> > | * org-html.el (org-export-html-preprocess): Ditto.
>>> > |
>>> > | * org-exp.el (org-export-with-LaTeX-fragments): Ditto.
>>> > |
>>> > | * org.texi (@LaTeX{} fragments): Document imagemagick as an
>>> > | alternative to dvipng.
>>> > |
>>> > `----
>>> >
>>> > org-create-formula-image got renamed, but the reference in
>>>ob-latex.el
>>> > to the original name was not changed.
>>> >
>>> > The quick-and-dirty "fix" is to change the reference in ob-latex.el
>>>to
>>> > org-create-formula-image-dvipng or
>>>org-create-formula-image-imagemagick,
>>> > depending on which method you happen to be using. But one would
>>>resort
>>> > to that only in the direst emergency in order to get something
>>>working
>>> > as quickly as possible.
>>> >
>>> > IMO, it would be better to have split the dvipng/imagemagick
>>>decision at
>>> > a lower level in the code. That way, both org-format-latex and
>>> > org-babel-execute:latex would use the common function. As it is,
>>> > org-format-latex is a fairly "dirty" function and with the split, it
>>>got
>>> > even dirtier.
>>> >
>>> > But there may be difficulties that my quick glance through the code
>>>has
>>> > not uncovered: it needs a deeper look.
>>> >
>>>
>>> So, what would you recommend as a full fix in ob-latex.el? The
>>>attached
>>> commit selects an alternate function based on the value of the
>>> `org-latex-create-formula-image-program' variable. Does this seem like
>>> an appropriate fix to the problem?
>>>
>>
>> For the time being, yes: I think this fix is entirely appropriate (nb:
>> haven't tested it yet though).
>>
>> In the longer run, I would like to see a single function
>> (org-create-formula-image redux) be called from the two call sites
>> (org-format-latex and org-babel-execute:latex) and have the
>> dvipng/imagemagick/etc split be entirely within that function. It's
>> bound to happen that more methods of creating images (the etc part
>> above) will need to be added in the future and it behooves one to
>> arrange it so that only one place in the code is affected.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nick
>>
>
>Alright,
>
>I've just committed a patch which gets part-way to your suggest
>solution. While the two backend-specific functions are still separate
>(I agree they should be combined), I have brought back the
>`org-create-formula-image' function, which now dispatches to the backend
>specific functions.
>
>Additionally there are some problems in the `org-format-latex' function.
>It lists mandatory arguments as optional, and appears to create
>variables which are not required or properly set.
>
>These function should probably be cleaned at some point up by whoever is
>maintaining Org-mode's LaTeX interfaces.
>
>Cheers,
>
>--
>Eric Schulte
>http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
Thanks. Things now get a lot further, but I'm still not quite getting what
I was hoping for. In particular, this source:
#+begin_src latex :file test.png
\frac{1}{2}
#+end_src
results in this output:
#+Results:
#+BEGIN_LaTeX
[[file:test.png]]
#+END_LaTeX
There are two problems here.
1) I'd like the graphic file to be displayed inline in the org file
buffer, so I don't think I want those #+BEGIN_LaTeX ... #+END_LaTeX lines
2) There is no file test.png in the current working directory.
It may well be that I'm missing something, but I can't quite see what...
Thanks.
Richard Stanton
