Tom, > :results output sounds right for awk as a report formatter. I'm > wondering if there is a need for :results value with awk?
yes, i agree. i didn't get far enough into the code to see where the "value" result was coming from. cheers, Greg
Tom, > :results output sounds right for awk as a report formatter. I'm > wondering if there is a need for :results value with awk?
yes, i agree. i didn't get far enough into the code to see where the "value" result was coming from. cheers, Greg