suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> writes: Hi:
> Does that mean a user can add any new language like this with her/his > definitions in their personal setup? If that is possible it would be > a really flexible setup. Yes. If you sit down and create the language specification in GNU Source Highlight, you can add any languages. I would have to do that for work being that we used a specialized version of TCL. > The defaults look pretty good for a fallback. :) Yes. I found something odd while addressing your question. For some reason I have to force the pen back to black. I checked the groff output and it looked ok. I had to make this change into the code. > would be good to see whether they stand out well when surrounded by > normal text. I think that it is a fair question. For that I had to do some minor changes to make it more evident from the last one that you saw. These are: 1. Changed from DS L to DS I. It will cause the text to be indented. 2. Force black pen on fallback mode. This required an emacs lisp code change. 3. Remove the font reduction. I placed it before because of some long code that I used for testing. I do not think that you need to do that for writing code in org. Source: http://ppl.ug/R-WxCXnp_As/ PDF Output: http://ppl.ug/At07I2gFUBo/ -- Luis R. Anaya papo anaya aroba hot mail punto com "Do not use 100 words if you can say it in 10" - Yamamoto Tsunetomo
