Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote: > >> Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote: >> >> > ... >> > >> > I haven't gone to gmane looking for the discussion, but if one of the >> > principals involved remembers the reason, maybe they can enlighten us. >> > >> >> I found the discussion on gmane - check the thread starting at >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/45243 >> > > Having read the discussion, I agree with Nicolas and disagree with Matt > and Bastien :-)
Let me chime in here: I agree that the new behavior (i.e., following a link with return) is unworkable with the current definition of org-at-timestamp-p. My concern in the previous thread was to preserved what I viewed as a convenience that dated back to the earliest days of org: i.e., being able to change timestamps quickly with the S-arrow keys. I would still prefer to retain a "wide" definition of timestamps for the S-arrow keys. But if a little traditional usability is lost for the sake of consistency, then we should change org-at-timestamp-p. (And Nicolas has done heroic work in bringing consistency to the definition of various org elements!) Best, Matt
