Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes: > Bastien writes: >> 1. one about `buffer-substring-filters' >> We should write a compatibility function to get rid of the first >> warning. > > Actually it is a variable and it "just" needs to be aliased suitably, > depending on which Emacs version it encounters.
I'm afraid this is not that straightforward, because the use of `filter-buffer-substring-functions' and `buffer-substring-filters' differ. > This should be done > with a macro in org-compat.el (which doesn't exist yet, see my attempt > at such a macro in another thread), then org can use the aliased name > only. In general I'd say org-compat.el is in need of some love. Make yourself at home there :) > >> 2. one about `entry' not having a prefix >> Prefixing `entry' is not straightforward but should be possible. > > I don't know enough about its uses to help here. No problem. >> 3. one about `date', `annotation', 'initial' not having a prefix >> As for the last warnings, I think we'll have to live with it, >> but chasing down places where *some* instance can be prefixed >> (or renamed with a more explicit name) could be good. Not a >> high priority though. > > I think one could also alias these (the prefix should be that of the > package where they come from), so that all uses within org use that > prefix. That would probably leave one warning at the point where the > alias is defined, which could be wrapped into with-no-warning. Good idea. When you have time for a patch to testing this solution, let me know. Thanks! -- Bastien
