Hi Carsten and Max, "Dominik, Carsten" <c.domi...@uva.nl> writes:
> already in Januar, Max Mikhanosha had published the first > version of his code to implement multiple agenda buffers. I have > worked with him over the last few weeks, and we think that > it is now quite stable. I've been trying the agenda-sticky branch a few times now and I love this feature -- thanks a lot! One request: I often use buffer restrictions in combination with agenda views. For example, I restrict to a first-level tree then run my daily agenda on that tree. In this case, using sticky agenda is a bit confusing because I expect a completely different agenda view while using the same agenda key (none of the items in a tree are part of another subtree.) Could we have an option allowing a set of rules (or a set of agenda views) for which we want the rebuilding to be done automatically? I would turn on this for my daily agenda views. Thanks, -- Bastien
