On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Is it still hand written? If so, I think it's ultimately a bad idea >> and it should be rewritten using ragel. > > I guess that's because you're not fluent in english, but this sounds > a bit "peremptory". We are not only interested in code, we are also
Sorry I've made a bad impression or if my remarks feels a bit passive-agressive. It's harder (and longer) for me to write in english, yes :p > interested in learning from each others. That's what make this list > a nice place to live in. If you have code or explanations you want > to share, please do! >From my classes, I thought it was widely accepted that sufficiently complex parsers should now be written by a tool like ragel. But again I'm not experienced, I never had to parse a complex language.
