Hello,
Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes:
> For what it is worth, I do agree that this looks wrong now and changing
> it would make it better. I do not remember why I chose the sequence
> that we have now. Looking at it now, I would also insert ....... after
> ^^^^^^, and hope that ##### and $$$$$ never get any use :)
For the record, `e-ascii' back-end currently uses the following default
set-up:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(defcustom org-e-ascii-underline '((ascii ?= ?~ ?-)
(latin1 ?= ?~ ?-)
(utf-8 ?═ ?─ ?╌ ?┄ ?┈))
"Characters for underlining headings in ASCII export.
Alist whose key is a symbol among `ascii', `latin1' and `utf-8'
and whose value is a list of characters.
For each supported charset, this variable associates a sequence
of underline characters. In a sequence, the characters will be
used in order for headlines level 1, 2, ... If no character is
available for a given level, the headline won't be underlined."
:group 'org-export-e-ascii
:type '(list
(cons :tag "Underline characters sequence"
(const :tag "ASCII charset" ascii)
(repeat character))
(cons :tag "Underline characters sequence"
(const :tag "Latin-1 charset" latin1)
(repeat character))
(cons :tag "Underline characters sequence"
(const :tag "UTF-8 charset" utf-8)
(repeat character))))
#+end_src
IMO, ...., ^^^^^, #####, $$$$$$ are just ugly and should require user's
approval (i.e. customization).
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
