As a followup to my last comment, this explains how Stapel fooled almost everybody and kept raw data hidden:
http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/the-fraud-who-fooled-almost-everyone/27917 And NYT "Fraud Case Seen as a Red Flag for Psychology Research" which has a raw data take: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/health/research/noted-dutch-psychologist-stapel-accused-of-research-fraud.html Thanks for the videos, Stephen, I will check them out. I have been running across scads of fraud stories and interesting studies on conflict of interest, reliability of research results, etc. It's all over the place, just scattered and nobody pays much attention, perhaps not wanting to believe it. Reproducible research aims directly at this stuff. Chapeau! Samuel -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
