Hi Brian, Brian Wightman <midlife...@wightmanfam.org> writes:
> Given that a common recommendation for a bug fix is to 'try commit > blah blah blah', would it make sense to have bug fixes go onto a > 'maint' branch (as well as master), and new features / changed > features stay on the master branch? Yes, this makes sense, and this has already been suggested. The reason why I'm not using such a scheme is 1) pure laziness and 2) the fact that the current git scheme is "good enough". But it might not be good enough for long, and perhaps future maintainers will not be as lazy as I am wrt this. Thanks for the suggestion, -- Bastien
