Hi Achim On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 08:01, Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> wrote: > Why should the git-describe info not be part of the ELPA tarball? If > there is a good reason not to include it (I think it is useful > to know which commit the ELPA archive was built on) one could alter the > include file before rolling the tar ball of course.
Now I see. No need for that, I didn't take into account that git describe is not used to _replace_ "7.7" any more as my simpler implementation did but is just _added_. Again the cleaner solution, without the need for different behaviors. Michael
