Hi Sébastien,
"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes:
> I find this behavior not entirely satisfying, even if I can fully accept that
> ">" is a forbidden character in the TODO states. For example, we could think
> of a warning being generated, or of the state being fully ignored, or ...
I agree there is inconsistency here. Special chars are allowed in TODO
keywords but they create the confusion you describe when used at the beg
or the end of the keyword ("NE>W" is safe AFAICT.)
> BTW, do you have an alternative for this "NEW" state, in 4 positions?
> ;-)
NIOU?
:)
--
Bastien
