On Oct 19, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Michael Brand wrote: > Hi Carsten > > On 18.10.2011, at 20:03, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: >> I do worry about one point, namely that C-c C-> (outline-demote) should still >> work. And it does work in regular outline mode. For example, if I rename my >> test file to c.otl and then use C-c C-> on the main heading, all the subtrees >> are demoted as I expected. Whereas in org mode the leaf subtree gets a space >> instead of a * when it is being demoted. > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 09:14, Carsten Dominik > <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Another option, if you prefer the C-> and C-< bindings is this: >> >> (add-hook 'org-mode-hook >> (lambda () >> (define-key org-mode-map [(control ?<)] 'org-promote-subtree) >> (define-key org-mode-map [(control ?>)] 'org-demote-subtree))) > > My suggestion is something like > > (define-key org-mode-map [remap outline-promote] 'org-promote-subtree) > (define-key org-mode-map [remap outline-demote] 'org-demote-subtree) > [...] > > permanently built into Org mode (not in org-mode-hook) for these and > maybe even a few more outline-* bindings to get the incompatible > outline-* bindings out of the way from within Org mode. > > This remap does not affect the bindings in Outline mode and resolves > the issue of the OP in Org mode, independent of, to which key any user > might have mapped outline-*mote.
Would you like to carefully think about which other functions you might want to have remapped, and then prepare a patch? - Carsten
