Dave Abrahams <d...@boostpro.com> writes: > on Sat Sep 17 2011, Bernt Hansen <bernt-AT-norang.ca> wrote: > >> Dave Abrahams <d...@boostpro.com> writes: >> >>> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and >>> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See >>> >>> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback >>> >>> Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list. >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> I have the following in my properties drawer: >>> >>> :Message: [[message://4e6b5b46.50...@josuttis.de][Review of "The C++ >>> Standard Library, 2nd Edition"]] >>> >>> The rendering looks like the attached screenshot, though: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Emacs : GNU Emacs 23.3.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0, Carbon Version 1.6.0 >>> AppKit 1038.36) >>> of 2011-09-12 on pluto.luannocracy.com >>> Package: Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.292.g0d4e8.dirty) >> >> This works fine for me on Linux in a minimal emacs setup. >> Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.297.g64784.dirty) >> GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.0) of 2010-12-11 >> on raven, modified by Debian >> >> I have strikethrough disabled in my normal setup >> (http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html#sec-16-4) but my minimal emacs test >> doesn't include this setting. >> >> Can you check if it is something in your local configuration that is >> causing this problem? > > Heh, it even happens with emacs -Q if you have a "+" character in the > previous line (which is required with my .emacs as well to reproduce the > problem): > > ** TODO whatever > :PROPERTIES: > :Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:42:46 +0200 > :Message: [[message://4e6b5b46.50...@josuttis.de][Review of "The > C++ Standard Library, 2nd Edition"]], > [[message://4e748b89.8080...@josuttis.de][{libbok2} Updated files: io, > i18n, container adapters]] > :END:
Ah, I didn't have the + on the previous line earlier. I can reproduce this with the above example. Personally I would just turn off the strike-through emphasis to 'fix' this problem but maybe the regexp that matches emphasis on a line shouldn't allow newlines to match. I'm not sure what other side effects this change might have. -Bernt
