Olaf Dietsche <olaf+list.orgm...@olafdietsche.de> writes:
> Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> That was my plan if I was not able to do from within Org. To me it would
>> be a lot faster than hacking something together in emacs-lisp,
>> unfortunately.
>
> If you insist on elisp, maybe something along these (untested) lines
> might work:
>
> ---8<--- cut here ---
[buggy code]
> --- cut here --->8---
I finally came around and tested the code, but unfortunately it doesn't
work as expected. Here is another version:
---8<--- cut here ---
(defun collect-clock-lines ()
(let ((re (concat "^[ \t]*" org-clock-string "[ \t]+\\(.+?\\)[ \t]+=>[
\t]+\\(.+\\)"))
(headline (nth 4 (org-heading-components)))
clocks)
(org-narrow-to-subtree)
(while (re-search-forward re nil t)
(setq clocks (concat clocks (format "| %s | %s | %s |\n" (match-string 1)
headline (match-string 2)))))
(widen)
clocks))
(defun summarize-clocks ()
(interactive)
(insert "| date | headline | total |\n|-----+----+----|\n")
(let ((headings (org-map-entries 'collect-clock-lines nil 'file)))
(mapc (lambda (clocks)
(mapc (lambda (line) (insert line)) clocks))
headings)))
--- cut here --->8---
This version works a little bit better, but has its own drawbacks.
Anyway, it's a start and I don't want to take all the fun away. ;-)
Regards, Olaf
