Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> what has happened to this patch? Did you stop it due to my questions? >>> That was not my intention - so if you are convinced that it works well, >>> it might be a good solution. >>> >>> On Jul 21, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >>> >>>> In order to circumvent the slow process at initialization, I've >>>> implemented an asynchronous initialization. Thus, one can open the >>>> buffer and start to write in it before initialization is complete. Once >>>> it is done, everything else is synchronous again. >>>> >>>> I think it is a good compromise. It needs testing though. Thus, if >>>> anyone is interested, I'll gladly hear his feedback. >>>> >>>> The branch is located at : >>>> >>>> git://github.com/ngz/org-mode-lists.git indent-patch-no-timer >> >> It's still there. As I use neither Org indent mode nor Visual line mode, >> feedback is important. Have you tried it since asynchronous >> initialization implementation? Does it solve the problems you raised? >> >> Bernt Hansen has been testing it for a few weeks now. As far as I know, >> he hasn't encountered any problem so far. > > Well, if Bernt has been testing is w/o problems, it probably works. > I propose you push it into master, to make everyone use it - this > will be a good way to find out if there are niches > where it causes problems.
I've been using it for awhile and haven't noticed any issues with it. I use org-indent mode but I don't use visual line mode. I've switched back and forth between this branch and master a few times during my testing. I think incorporating it in master so it gets more exposure for testing is a good idea. -Bernt