Hi Pierre,
Any objection for applying this patch?
Pierre de Buyl wrote:
> I checked and indeed "content" is working well.
>
> Pierre
>
> Le 1 juil. 11 à 16:06, Sebastien Vauban a écrit :
>
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> Pierre de Buyl wrote:
>>> Le 28 juin 11 à 23:45, Sebastien Vauban a écrit :
>>>> Here is thus my proposition for a better div-structured HTML.
>>>>
>>>> There are only four parts required in the HTML for all the magic to work
>>>> with the CSS:
>>>>
>>>> - The first part is a container div ("content", by default) that surrounds
>>>> everything.
>>>>
>>>> - Inside that are three more parts:
>>>> + a preamble (in a div, if the user wants it),
>>>> + a div "body" and
>>>> + a postamble (in a div, if the user wants it).
>>>
>>> I think my regular use of the html export would be broken.
>>
>> We'll try to solve that, then.
>>
>>> I add a <div id="wrapper"> in the preamble and a </div> in the postamble.
>>> This allows me to make a "boxed" page (see
>>> http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~pdebuyl/ ) which I like.
>>>
>>> If I cannot end my div in the postamble, I think it would break my setup.
>>>
>>> Here is my setup:
>>> :html-preamble "
>>> <div id=\"wrapper\">
>>> <div id=\"menu\">
>>> HERE, some static menu items.
>>> </div>
>>> "
>>> :html-postamble "
>>> </div>
>>> "
>>
>> Why are you adding a `wrapper' div in the already existing `content' div
>> (that
>> surrounds everything). I see no real difference between both.
>>
>>> I tried without that extra div and I cannot reproduce my former layout.
>>
>> Would you apply your CSS rule onto `content', would that make a diff?
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
