Hello Nick and Michael, Sorry for the delayed response. I had an important appointment.
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:39:13 +0200 Michael Markert <markert.mich...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > With this patch for the makefile I can get it running: > > -- <snap> --- > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index 239ab2e..2d1d324 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -230,12 +230,11 @@ autoloads: lisp/org-install.el > > lisp/org-install.el: $(LISPFILES0) Makefile > $(BATCH) --eval "(require 'autoload)" \ > - --eval '(find-file "org-install.el")' \ > + --eval '(find-file "lisp/org-install.el")' \ > --eval '(erase-buffer)' \ > - --eval '(mapc (lambda (x) (generate-file-autoloads > (symbol-name x))) (quote ($(LISPFILES0))))' \ > + --eval '(mapc (lambda (x) (generate-file-autoloads > (symbol-name x))) (quote ($(LISPF))))' \ --eval '(insert "\n(provide > (quote org-install))\n")' \ --eval '(save-buffer)' > - mv org-install.el lisp > > doc/org: doc/org.texi > (cd doc && $(MAKEINFO) --no-split org.texi -o org) > > -- <snap> --- This patch to the Makefile generates the autoloads without the lisp/ prefix for me and works without errors. However as Nick says, maybe its worthwhile to understand why this was happening in the first place. My lisp knowledge is very little, but please let me know if I can help track this down. > > Michael Thanks a lot. :) -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
