"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: > The only case that pops up to my mind now, of such a use case where > overwriting could be "needed" (well, let's say useful) is for some pedagogical > document that one would write, where code is constructed from a simplistic > (and buggy) approach to a correct one. > > One could say: the code to do that is this one, and show the block contents. > > Then, discover problems to it, explain them in the document, and make a new > version of the block with the same name (for tangling reasons). > > Then, highlight some limitations of the new code, fix them in a new block with > the same name, etc. > > Does that mean it needs to be implemented? Up to you...
I gave a similar example earlier, and I think Eric said that can be handled by just changing the tangle header for the code you overwrite. Not as convenient, though.
