Hi Nick, A very big thank you for that crystal clear code commentary.
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:50:34 -0400 Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote: > <soapbox> I've tried to keep a neutral tone in (most of) the rest of > the mail, but I have to say that I think clever hacks like this are > too clever for their own good - they are at best an accident of > implementation. The fact that the trick uses the placement option in > order to change the font testifies to that. After the very clear description above, I agree 100%. I will remove my addition to the manual and instead try to improve the #+ATTR_LaTeX: documentation based on your code commentary. At the moment I am facing a very important deadline for the 8th of June, I will submit a revised patch after that. > They should certainly be documented as hacks on Worg, but I'm not sure > they should be documented in the manual. Of course, it may happen that > a really good hack (by some definition of "really good") should be > elevated to a standard and documented in the manual, but IMO this one > does not qualify. </soapbox> > Along with the revisions for the manual, I will document my hack on Worg. > Comments, corrections, additions are more than welcome. > Thanks a lot! :) > Nick -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
