On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 22:55, Nicolas <n.goaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > [snip] > >>> Also, you may have a look at default templates, as your HTML variant is >>> slightly wrong (wrt <br> tag). > >> I'm not sure to understand what's "wrong". You mean the fact I added manually >> a <br> tag after the title? > > I just meant that you could replace <br> by <br />. I think both are > valid HTML-wise, but Emacs doesn't report an error with the latter.
<br> is valid HTML, <br /> is valid XHTML. Browsers will treat both the same way in almost every case since it’s all tag soup to them.[1] Org uses XHTML as far as I can tell, so <br /> is the correct choice here. Aankhen [1]: Unless you’re serving it up as real XHTML, which I highly doubt. ;-)
