Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > Also, this new property, when set, does not allow :clock-resume, > I have not checked if something bad would happen should a user > give both by accident.
Ah yes, thanks for bringing this up: :clock-keep has precedence over :clock-resume -- when both are non-nil, :clock-resume will be discarded. I mentioned this in the manual. Thanks! -- Bastien
