On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Thorsten < gruenderteam.ber...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes: > > > I've used Lilypond and think it's amazing. But... what advantage is > > having it in org? Just curious... integration in foldable headlines > > and src blocks? For my uses, I can't think of a purpose unless, I > > guess, I was doing in-document scores or bars like in a wedding > > program or something. What was your idea -- I'm interested. > > > > John > > I thought about writing a music book with the typesetting done by LaTex > and Lilypond. I know it should work just like combining R and LaTex with > Sweave, but the last time I tried I had problems - integration in Org > could make it easy. And, since nowadays books are shared on the web for > free and the author starves, one might want to reuse the content in the > setting of an online music school. Orgmode's html export would make this > easy. > > Cool -- this was along my thoughts. I like it! I agree it can't be that hard to integrate. It's a pretty simple markup. John > Thorsten > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
