Anyway, I'd like to see the development of org go towards decoupling it from the emacs GUI and allowing the core logic to be used from other languages; I'd say the easiest way would be to provide a JSON-like HTTP protocol; not sure how easy/hard would it be to develop a HTTP server and run it from the headless emacs as a daemon.
Marcelo. On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celose...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had just that very idea yesterday but thought it would be too crazy; > A new startup? :D > > Marcelo. > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Konrad Hinsen > <konrad.hin...@fastmail.net> wrote: >> On 14 Feb 2011, at 22:39, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: >> >>> This would be awesome, and I think this is the path the emacs >>> developers should take -- separating emacs into two, the GUI and the >>> core elisp interpreter. I'm sure this wouldn't be easy, but imagine >> >> Emacs already has a batch mode, and very different GUI layers (terminal, >> X11, Mac, Windows), so I'd suspect that a "no GUI" version that can be >> compiled anywhere would not be so difficult. It may be more difficult to >> make a separate GUI layer, but that wouldn't be very important either from a >> practical point of view. >> >> BTW, another Emacs GUI I'd like to see is a Web-based one. Imagine >> connecting to your home machine from a Web browser and getting access to a >> copy of Emacs running there! >> >> Konrad. >> > _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
