Jeff Horn <jrhorn...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison <dandavis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I strongly second this. In fact I'll stick my neck out more: Worg is >> great, but for tutorials on org-mode, HTML export is often the wrong >> format for obvious reasons (i.e. unless you go to some trouble, it >> conceals a lot of the org syntax). I'm tempted to suggest that htmlized >> output should be the default format for many org tutorials on Worg. > > I respectfully disagree with your assertion. When someone writes a > document "properly", i.e. in a literate fashion, i.e. using org source > blocks, the right syntax is shown at the right time. Please see the > manual as an example. > > Now, I'm no fan of nerfing choices in order to force anyone to do > things "The Right Way (tm)", but it bears mentioning. > > I see no harm in publishing using org-publish-org-to-org with htmlize. > We could even add a link in the footer or header of each page that > links to the htmlized source. I do *not* agree in making it the > "default format" for any page.
FYI, Bastien implemented the htmlize version of Worg Tuesday. You can see it on any Worg page by replacing .html with .org.html. Example: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.org.html http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/intro.html Maybe we should add some colors to that htmlize output. I agree a link to the Org version on every page would be useful. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
