On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison <dandavis...@gmail.com> wrote: > I strongly second this. In fact I'll stick my neck out more: Worg is > great, but for tutorials on org-mode, HTML export is often the wrong > format for obvious reasons (i.e. unless you go to some trouble, it > conceals a lot of the org syntax). I'm tempted to suggest that htmlized > output should be the default format for many org tutorials on Worg.
I respectfully disagree with your assertion. When someone writes a document "properly", i.e. in a literate fashion, i.e. using org source blocks, the right syntax is shown at the right time. Please see the manual as an example. Now, I'm no fan of nerfing choices in order to force anyone to do things "The Right Way (tm)", but it bears mentioning. I see no harm in publishing using org-publish-org-to-org with htmlize. We could even add a link in the footer or header of each page that links to the htmlized source. I do *not* agree in making it the "default format" for any page. -- Jeffrey Horn http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
