Matt Lundin <m...@imapmail.org> writes: > Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celose...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> However, I've got hooked. Vim (in my case, MacVim) has conquered my >> hands. I know I'm risking myself a lot by saying it on an >> emacs-related mailing list, but the Vim navigation and the vim model >> in general is much more efficient for editing text. > > Empirical evidence? ;) > > FWIW, Org-mode has its own "modal" editing feature: org speed keys. This > enables one to edit and reorganize the structure of org files with > single keystrokes. > >> So, how many of you here also use Vim? :) > > For quick editing (e.g., config files), I use vi(m). For anything else, > I use emacs. Both are fantastic tools.
Doesn't emacsclient make emacs just as quick for editing of random files encountered at the command line? If emacsclient is aliased to, say, 'e', and if the WM automatically shifts focus to the running emacs, then that should be pretty quick. Dan > > Best, > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
