I briefly mentioned the approach you describe below earlier in this thread [1], and while I see the appeal of this approach, I think that the second approach I described in that same message (using offsets instead of comments) is preferable -- although I am of course open to being persuaded otherwise.
Best -- Eric Seth Burleigh <wbu...@gmail.com> writes: > I would just like to throw in a quick idea. > The easiest way to support noweb tangling is to get org-babel-tangle to > create nested tags and change detangle to take these into account. > > for example, i have the forex_user source block that is tangled. > > ;; [[file:~/Dropbox/.rep/clj-forex/clj-forex.org::*User][forex_user]] > my code... > ;; [[file:~/Dropbox/.rep/clj-forex/clj-forex.org::*User][embedded_block]] > my embedded code ... > ;; embedded_block ends here > ;; forex_user ends here > > corresponding to a forex_user block of > #+begin_src > my code ... > <<embedded_block>> > #+end_src > > This would only work for noweb on separate lines and preferably only when > one block is noweb embedded into one other source block, but i believe that > this is the most common case anyways. This could be enforced in the > detangle/tangle code. > > Then, a separate minor mode could make these file: markers invisible and > create a colored overlay pattern per source block code. Saving the file > would still save the markers, you just wouldnt see them if the minor mode > was on. Footnotes: [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/35863/focus=35971 _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
