Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: > Hi Eric, > > "Eric Schulte" wrote: >> Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: >>> (I thought this feature would be implemented using "real" SQL vars, hence >>> my @ >>> prefix. But viewing the code shows the replacement is made outside of the >>> SQL >>> snippet's knowledge.) >> >> I agree that using real SQL variables would be preferable. If you want >> to submit a patch to this effect I would be happy to review it and apply. > > I'll give a shot -- not in the really short term, though. Which example should > I look at? shell? >
great, and please no rush. shell actually has rather sophisticated variable passing, maybe sqlite and gnuplot would provide examples more similar to sql. > > >>> Maybe the following should be put on some TODO list, even if not urgent? >>> >>>>> * No warning if block does not exist >>>>> >>>>> Please note that inexistent references are ignored, without further >>>>> notice. That's the case for such a block (where I forgot the number >>>>> suffix): >>>>> >>>>> #+srcname: contains-inexistent-ref >>>>> #+begin_src sql :noweb yes >>>>> <<add-column-in-table>> >>>>> #+end_src >> >> The lack of notice (or error) was originally intentional. The logic >> being that there may be languages in which <<something>> constructs are >> part of the language syntax, and in those languages Org-mode should >> ignore such constructs unless the "something" contained in the <<>>'s is >> actually the name of a code block. >> >> It may make sense to revisit this design decision. > > IMHO, it should, yes. Because a typo is so easy, and the results can be very > different then, from what's expected... OK, there is always a preview mode, > but an alert is better (for me). > > Maybe adding an option for those languages, that would suppress such warnings? > That may be the best idea, once again a header argument may be the most flexible solution. > > Re helper functions for such named code blocks, do you have an idea what I > should do to have the IMenu index of code blocks working? See previous thread > [[http://mid.gmane.org/808w09foxd.fsf%40missioncriticalit.com][Re: imenu > support for babel blocks]]. > I don't have any experience with IMenu support, however to map over all code blocks in a file extracting information I would suggest using the org-babel-map-src-blocks macro. Cheers -- Eric > > Thanks for any hint! > > Best regards, > Seb _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode