Hi Seb, Thanks for the proof reading. I have answers for some of your questions below.
Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: > > Page 9 -- You say that "tags and properties of a node are inherited by its > sub-nodes". I agree for tags, not for properties (at least, by default). > With respect to code blocks properties are inherited by subnodes, at least all properties which can be used as header arguments are inherited. > > BTW, what happens if there is a name clash with other code blocks (in the same > document, or in the LOB)? Though, this is not for your paper... > While no behavior is guaranteed in this case (meaning don't do it :)) I believe that whichever code block is found first will be used, in practice this would probably mean that local code blocks will override lob code blocks, but I make no guarantees > > Side comment -- Wouldn't you use a standard way of handling the acronyms in > LaTeX, so that they're expanded when required, and listed at the end of the > document? Example of such acro: ESS. > I don't understand what you mean by "standard acronyms" can you give a specific location and how you would suggest it be changed? Thanks -- Eric _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
