Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: >> I imagine that such a change would meet with some resistance, at least I >> know I would not want all of my table names exported by default. > > You name it... "by default", meaning such a behavior should be "switchable": > on or off. > > >> Is there a reason you don't just add the table name manually? e.g. >> >> Numbers-1 >> #+tblname: numbers-1 >> | 1 | >> | 2 | >> | 45 | >> | test | >> | 3.141592 | > > I'm not really enthousiast about solutions that would be manual. > > On the contrary, even if table names were always exported, the name can easily > disappear from your documents with just a (very) little bit of CSS or LaTeX > code. In CSS, just apply "display: none" on the DIV, and you're done. I don't > really understand the resistance you're talking about, then. > > To sum up, if the info is there, it's really easy to remove it (even > automatically!). If it's not there, it's quite a tedious task to add it > (manually)... > > Do you understand the need I'm trying to express? >
Yes, I understand the need you express and I agree that this would be a useful addition to the export engine. I'm not sure how the export or table names (and probably other types of names including results and maybe other Org-mode comments) would be toggled on and off however, but perhaps someone better acquainted with the export engine than myself would know. Best -- Eric > > Best regards, > Seb _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode