Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: > Hello, > > Two small questions, with that minimal example: > > #+begin_src org > ,* Database > , > ,** Back up the database > , > ,Create a backup file of the existing database: > , > ,#+srcname: backup-db(dbName, dbBackupFile) > ,#+begin_src sql > ,BACKUP DATABASE dbName TO DISK = 'dbBackupFile' > ,go > ,#+end_src > , > ,** Back up the database > , > ,Create a backup file of the existing database: > , > ,#+srcname: backup-db :var dbName :var dbBackupFile > ,#+begin_src sql > ,BACKUP DATABASE dbName TO DISK = 'dbBackupFile' > ,go > ,#+end_src > #+end_src > > 1. I read on http://orgmode.org/manual/var.html that the second way to pass > arguments is "more natural". Though, "nobody" "never" uses it in all the > examples published on this ML. Why? Are there still subtle differences, or > could such come in the future that would make one choose one over the > other? >
I think we are committed to maintaining both ways of defining variables for code blocks for the foreseeable future. > > 2. In both cases, the variables are not exported to HTML (and LaTeX?), making > the readability of such a documented code a bit difficult. Feature or bug? > The variable names should be exported to both HTML and LaTeX (when org-export-latex-listings is set to true) when the following declaration schema is used (at least they are for me). #+source: something(x=9) #+begin_src emacs-lisp x #+end_src Best -- Eric > > Best regards, > Seb _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
