Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <celose...@gmail.com> writes: > I liked your self-contained approach, and I will try implementing it > in my workflow. Org does not stop amazing me on how flexible it is :) > > However, the value of having a wiki is also great IMO. It has a > workflow similar to tomboy (each new org file acts as a new tomboy > note) I don't have to think too much when creating a wiki page (just > type TheNameOfTheSubject.org, save it and begin typing, they are in a > central location (a wiki folder) and they are a great place to > register knowledge data. > > I don't know, that might be because I used WikiDPad for a long time on > my Windows days and loved its approach (Two things that org lacks as a > wiki-system, which is a way to view the wiki in a tree format and > automatically create links based on files in the filesystem or > camelcase. Not big deal features, but something that could be > contributed as a org extension - I would do it if I had the elisp > knowledge to do so :))
I used to use a wiki ... but I personally prefer the org->HTML export sequence to a wiki. All of my documents are available in org-mode source. I don't have the need to have multiple users edit the same source (which is the whole point of a wiki IMO). Wiki's have other issues if they are world editable - like spam bots and other things which I just didn't want to deal with. I found the org-mode format with export at least as powerful as the wiki's I've used. If you community of people working on the same content where some of them don't use org-mode then a wiki probably makes sense. I just don't need it for my workflow. -Bernt _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
