> > Habits are different from tasks. It is "suggested" that you do them within > a range of time, but it's not completion which is important, rather > consistency over the long-run. Hence the graph to indicate your overall > progress on the goal of being consistent. >
But isn't consistency in the long-run the fact that you have actually *completed* them? So, the thing here is the concept of habit. So, from what I could understand, a habit has to happen during a period of time and have a deadline. In this case, IMO, a weekly review is a habit, even though it does not happen daily, it still has consistent period to be respected (1 day, every seven days), and a deadline (the very same day). Or habits need to be daily? Thanks! On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:34 AM, John Wiegley <jwieg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 23, 2009, at 2:10 AM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote: > > How could I define it so I can have a habit that happens weekly but that >> has a hard deadline of that very same weekday it has been specified to? >> > > In this case you would use an ordinary task with a ++1w repeater. Are you > wanting to use habits just for the graph? > > Habits are different from tasks. It is "suggested" that you do them within > a range of time, but it's not completion which is important, rather > consistency over the long-run. Hence the graph to indicate your overall > progress on the goal of being consistent. > > A weekly review, on the other hand, is something that you really should do > every week, and if you miss it doesn't matter how well you've been doing in > the past, a single missed week could throw you off considerably. > > John >
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
