Darlan Cavalcante Moreira <darc...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Eric, > > My comments are also inline > > At Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:11:50 -0600, > Eric Schulte wrote:
[...] >> what behavior would you suggest results from a :hide header argument? > > My suggestion is that if a source block has the :hide header argument it > should > be closed by default as if the user had pressed tab. The user could then press > tab at the "#BEGIN_SRC ..." line to show the content of the block and, maybe, > the block could be closed again if the cursor leaves the block. This can be > useful for other blocks as well. > That seems very reasonable. I'll pop this onto the TODO stack for org-babel (meaning hopefully something will happen at some time). > > Let me use the sage as inspiration again. In sage when you put the cursor > above > the text-area a blue line is showed. If you click on this line a new text-area > is created above the current one but the really nice trick is that shift+click > creates an HTML text-area (with a tool-bar with bold, italic, centralized > buttons, etc). Then you can create a worksheet in sage such as > +-----------------------+ > | Some HTML text | > | describing a problem | > | Use jsMath for | > | nice equations | > | with latex syntax | > +-----------------------+ > |%hide | > | some hidden code that | > | generates some output | > +-----------------------+ > | solution of the | > | problem that was | > |calculated by the code | > +-----------------------+ > > That is, when you are only interested in the output and not in the code itself > you use the %hide comment. I'm not sure what is the best way to handle the > :hide > argument when exporting. Maybe it is better to use it simple for folding in > the > org buffer and use another option to control export of the block. yes, I would agree that we should restrict the :hide argument to folding in the org-mode buffer. Currently there is an :exports header argument which takes the self-explanatory values of - none - code - results - both > For example, a ":noexport" option in addition to ":hide" and a buffer > option "don't export hidden bocks" in case the user wants to avoid > exporting all blocks with the :hide option. > > >> >> > >> > That's my two cents. It is really amazing what you can do with org-mode and >> > org-babel and I'm not saying in that org-babel should became more similar >> > to >> > sage. I only think that getting some inspiration from sage could be nice. >> > >> >> I agree completely, I'm sure that there are lessons to be learned from a >> project with such similarities. Now it's just a matter of getting to >> know a little bit more about Sage. >> >> Thanks -- Eric >> >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Darlan >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Emacs-orgmode mailing list >> > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >> > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > Regards, > > Darlan _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
