Earl Chase <[email protected]> writes: > I canceled this thread. I'm done working on this. You are free to > start your own thread. Just because you are ok receiving refined > patches in code reviews does not mean that I need to be ok with it.
I've pushed the code. I put you as the co-author. I offered you the main author spot but you didn't approve the code and it seems wrong to make someone the main author of something they don't approve of. That's it. This thread is done. It yielded results. Org Mode is now improved from your efforts. I appreciate the work you've put into this. I truly do. I viewed our relationship as one of collaborators that could freely share ideas and code with each other. I'm still not sure what I did wrong. I would love to know what you're thinking. In response to me sending code you have said: "I feel like that defeats the purpose of the whole endeavour." and "I'm not a reviewer so I don't see what the point of reviewing your code would be." I'm not sure what you mean by either of those statements. Is the endeavour not to improve org-habit? org-habit has not been seriously modified for a decade. If there is anyone I would want to review org-habit code at this point in time it would be you who has put in the work to understand it. Best regards, Morgan
