Julien Dallot <[email protected]> writes:

> Hello back,
>
>> My concern has nothing to do with users.
>> It is about third-party parsers that will have to implement Elisp parser
>> on top of Org parser.
>
> I'm not sure I get your point, as third-party parsers already had to deal 
> with emacs regexps in links. Or are you talking about parsing the plist's 
> properties?

I am talking about parsing plists themselves.

How should we interpret something like

<::(:id ?\s)>
or
<::(:id "foo\nbar")>
or
<::(:id "foo\"bar")>
or
<::(:id foo)>
?

and what about

<::(:id "foo\"bar" invalid??)>



-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode maintainer,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>

Reply via email to