Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > >> Consider the following timestamp with a typo in starting minute: >> >> <2022-04-11 Mon 17:1-19:10> >> ... >> >> Expected: The example timestamp is not parsed as a valid timestamp, but >> rather considered a paragraph. > > Upon further thinking, I do not think that the above should be parsed as > a paragraph. We are rather permissive about extra unrecognized text in > the timestamps - it is a feature. > > I, however, added a low-trust linter that reports timestamps with > unexpected extra text. > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=ab542a653 > > Handled.
I'm just letting BARK (https://tracker.orgmode.org) know this has been Resolved.
