"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> writes: > Jim Porter <[email protected]> writes: >> I'd much rather my limited time and energy go towards building up the >> next generation of free software hackers than to reviewing the output >> of a statistical model so I can root out all the highly-plausible but >> nevertheless incorrect bits. > > Same here. > > When I see signs of LLM use in suggested code, I usually don’t read on. > And if someone says “my AI said”, I don’t read on but ask them to > summarize the parts they verified. Reading LLM produced stuff is no fun.
Probably a silly question, but what are the implications of using an LLM to annalyze the suggested code? -- David Masterson
